उत्तराखंडकुमाऊंक्राइमगढ़वालदेहरादूनबड़ी ख़बर

उत्तराखंड से बड़ी खबर : BJP विधायक महेश नेगी यौन उत्पीड़न मामले में सुनवाई, डीएनए सैंपल देने के लिए सीजेएम कोर्ट में पेश नहीं हुए भाजपा विधायक नेगी

Photo of Uk Varta Desk Uk Varta Desk Follow on Twitter Send an email January 18, 2021
mahesh negi rape case

देहरादून: द्वाराहाट से भाजपा विधायक महेश नेगी के मामले को लेकर कोर्ट से बड़ी खबर है। जी हां विधायक की मुश्किलें कम होने का नाम नहीं ले रही है। आपको बता दें कि देहरादून सीजेएम कोर्ट ने 23 फरवरी तक शीत अवकाश होने के कारण विधायक महेश नेगी के डीएनए जांच के लिए ब्लड सैंपल लेने की नई तारीख तय की है। बता दें कि अब विधायक का ब्लड सैंपल 27 फरवरी को लेने का फैसला कोर्ट ने सुनाया है। मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट देहरादून की अदालत ने भाजपा विधायक महेश नेगी को आज डीएनए जांच के लिए ब्लड सैंपल देने के लिए अदालत में मौजूद रहने के आदेश दिए थे लेकिन, आज सुबह विधायक के वकील ने मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट की अदालत में एक प्रार्थना पत्र देकर 11 व 13 जनवरी को नैनीताल हाईकोर्ट की कार्यवाही का हवाला देते हुए दूसरी बैंच में मामला होने की बात कही। कोर्ट ने जानकारी दी कि 13 जनवरी को न्यायमूर्ति धनिक ने मामले की सुनवाई से इनकार कर दिया था। लिहाजा, 11 जनवरी को 48 घंटे के मिले स्टे की मियाद 13 जनवरी को ही खत्म हुई। इस बीच, नैनीताल हाईकोर्ट में शीत अवकाश होने के बाद सुनवाई वैकेशन बेंच को ट्रांसफर हो गई। सोमवार को नैनीताल हाईकोर्ट में वैकेशन बैंच न्यायमूर्ति धनिक की ही थी। लेकिन, न्यायमूर्ति धनिक 13 जनवरी को विधायक महेश नेगी के मामले को सुनने से इंकार कर चुके हैं।

सुनवाई के दौरान पीड़िता के वकील एसपी सिंह ने कोर्ट से अपील की कि विधायक के डीएनए मामले में हाईकोर्ट ने 13 जनवरी के बाद स्टे नहीं बढ़ाया इसलिए सोमवार को ब्लड सैंपल देने के लिए अदालत में नहीं आने पर विधायक महेश नेगी को वारंट जारी किया जाए। सुबह सुनवाई के बाद मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट ने दोपहर 2 बजे तक निर्णय सुरक्षित रखा था। दोपहर बाद अदालत ने अपना निर्णय सुनाते हुए विधायक महेश नेगी के डीएनए जांच के लिए ब्लड सैंपल लेने की नई तारीख 27 फरवरी तय की है।

15

Related posts:

SPECIAL पेशकश : क्या हो गया है दिमाग खराब तो पढ़े यह स्टोरी जरूर करेगी हेल्प The court, while granting bail to the accused arrested for raping a 14-year-old girl, said that there was a delay of one day in informing the police about the incident. Not only this, the investigation of this case has also been completed. In such a situation, there is no obstacle in giving bail to the accused. The court of Additional Sessions Judge Raj Rani, Rohini Court, has granted bail to accused Puran Singh Bisht on the basis of personal bond of Rs 20 thousand and surety of the same amount. Also, the court has imposed a special conditional on the accused. The court said that the accused would be permanently 15 to 20 kilometers away from the victim's house. Will never come in contact with the victim. The court said that the accused has been in judicial custody since 27 January 2021. A charge sheet has been filed in this case. At the same time, the court said that the one screw in this case is that there was a delay of one day in informing the police about the incident. The court said that after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is being granted bail. During the hearing on the bail application of the accused in the present case, the lawyer for the accused said that his client and the victim's family live in the same house. The victim's father had borrowed Rs.1 lakh 20 thousand from the accused in 2019. The accused asked the victim's father several times to return the money, but he did not return it. On the day of the incident, there was a fight between the accused and the victim's father over the same matter. Later, who was given the color of rape and his client was implicated in a false case. The accused accepted the condition of the court The defense counsel said that the accused is ready to live in a house 15-20 km from the area where the girl's family lives on rent. Additional Public Prosecutor AB Asthana opposed the bail plea on the grounds that the accused had serious charges under the IPC and the Poxo Act. The court granted bail to the accused on the condition that he would not go or live in the area where the victim lives. At the same time, the court has also instructed him not to contact the victim and his family members in any manner, not to threaten or influence the prosecution witnesses or to tamper with the evidence.पुलिस ने कि देरी तो रेप के आरोपी को मिली जमानत ,पढ़े पूरी खबर The High Court said that it has become a trend in Delhi that anytime people petition the court and start seeking priority in vaccination. If everyone is given priority, then the question is who will get the vaccine later. The government also has its own priorities. The court remarked, refusing to hear a petition filed to exempt from the clinical trial of anti-Kovid-19 foreign vaccines and to give priority to those who had taken the first dose in vaccination. The court made it clear that government policy matters cannot be interfered with. A bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh said that drafts of policies need to be prepared for the reliefs sought in the petitioner. It does not come under the jurisdiction of the court. The court will consider taking policy decisions only in exceptional cases. The court said that the petitioner Najia Praveen has sought to give priority to those who have taken the first dose in vaccination and such concession cannot be granted only by seeking. It has become a common practice in Delhi that anytime people petition the court and start seeking priority in vaccination. If all are given priority, then the question is whether the vaccine will be applied later. The government also has its own priorities. While seeking information regarding the status of the dosage ordered in connection with the vaccination campaign started from May 1, the bench said that such information can be obtained through Right to Information. For this, filing of writ petition or PIL is not the right way. The court, on its request to formulate a policy regarding the delivery of vaccines and allow exemption from clinical trials of anti-Kovid-19 foreign vaccines, said that the policy decisions are taken by the experts in the field as it is a complex task. The court said that some such cases have been raised in the petition, in respect of which a hearing is already going on in the Supreme Court. The court is currently asking the central government and Delhi government to consider the petition as a memorandum.हाईकोर्ट ने किया बड़ा सवाल – टीका लगवाने में हर कोई चाहता है प्राथमिकता, फिर बाद में किसे लगेगा KPSC Recruitment 2020: जाने सहायक वन आरक्षक में निकली भर्ती, देखे कैसे करे आवेदन Determine the maximum value of the equipment and medicines being used immediately so that their black marketing and hoarding can be stopped. Contempt notices have also been issued against those who have been booked in these charges since May 2. It has been told in the court that 40 cases have been registered in Delhi. The accused of hoarding and black marketing have been asked by the court to be present in the next hearing through video conferencing on May 19. Apart from this, the High Court has expressed deep concern over the excessive fees charged by the hospital managers during the epidemic. The court has asked the Delhi government to meet the hospital and their association to determine the price for the treatment. The court clarified that if it is not done soon, they will pass the order. A division bench of Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Rekha Palli said that this is a serious issue. The government should take concrete steps towards fixing treatment rates in private hospitals and nursing homes. The Delhi government said that the Principal Secretary of Health Department has been requested to meet with the hospital managers. In fact, before the bench, advocate Abhay Gupta quoted the Kerala government circular saying that the rates fixed by the government were fixed by the Delhi government last year Are also lower than fixed rates. The court had recently asked the government whether the already fixed rates should be revised in view of the huge increase in Kovid-19 cases as many hospitals have now been converted to 100 per cent Kovid-19 facilities. Gupta told the court that social media is full of complaints of high fees being charged for treatment in the hospital. He said that the government is providing free water, electricity, but only if we remain alive, we can use these facilities. Delhi government advocate Satyakam said that whenever a complaint comes, action is taken immediately. We cannot do anything without complaint because hospitals are also dealing with epidemics. The court disagreed with their argument and said that if there is no complaint, then we cannot ignore this fact. Advocate Rahul Mehra said that the Health Department Principal Secretary has been requested to meet all the hospitals. The court said that the case of hospitals overcharging patients is very serious. The government should decide the treatment rates in consultation with all the concerned parties. Apart from this, consider the amendment in the rates fixed last year and take a quick decision. During the hearing, Mehra pointed the bench to concrete action against the hospitals, saying that we can take strict action but in such a situation, the hospitals come to court and they have to withdraw the order after the court intervenes.दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट के कैंद्र सरकार को निर्देश, जल्द तय करें चिकित्सा उपकरणों के दाम The High Court has resented the Delhi government's argument that such patients should seek medication and medical aid from the state where they are undergoing treatment. The court said that in the second wave of Kovid-19, due to infection fatalities and incomplete preparations of the national capital's health infrastructure, people have been forced to undergo treatment in hospitals in neighboring states. Not only this, the court has sought answers from the Center, Delhi and Haryana government on the drug black fungus. Justice Rekha Palli made the remarks during a hearing on a petition by a Delhi-based man seeking liposomal amphotericin B injection / Amfonex-50 used in the treatment of black fungus for his father hospitalized in Gurugram. Went. While the Delhi government refused the drug. The court has fixed the matter for hearing on May 25, directing the Center, Delhi and Haryana government to file a reply to the notice. The Delhi government told the court during the hearing that the petitioner's father was not being treated in any hospital in the national capital, but in Gurugram. In such a situation, he can ask for medicines from the concerned authorities in Haryana. The court rejected the argument that Kovid was being treated by the petitioner's father for more than a month. Now the medicine he is seeking is immediately necessary for the treatment of the patient. The court clarified that it is a matter of public knowledge that the nature of the deadly infectious second wave of Kovid-19 and incomplete preparation of the health infrastructure in the capital has brought many other desperate people of Delhi like the petitioner's father to neighboring states Had to go to hospitals for admission and medical treatment. The court said that they believed that it would be in the interest of justice that the Delhi government should provide the necessary medicines to treat their father if possible, while adopting a sympathetic approach to the petitioner's insistence, even if at least the next few For days.हाईकोर्ट ने ब्लैक फंगस दवा पर केंद्र, दिल्ली व हरियाणा सरकार से मांगा जवाब The Delhi High Court has refused to give interim protection to businessman Navneet Kalra. Also, the hearing in cases related to anticipatory bail has been postponed till May 18. The anticipatory bail plea of ​​businessman Navneet Kalra was also heard in the court today. During this, Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, appearing on behalf of Delhi Police, said that why this person was given preference? The case was heard at seven o'clock on Thursday evening after the court time. Today is Eid holiday, what is special about anticipatory bail? On SV Raju's plea, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi said that if the court hears a case outside the time limit then itsनवनीत कालरा मामले की सुनवाई 18 मई तक स्थगित The High Court has said that the central and Delhi governments should not take lightly the shortfall in the Kovid-19 cases in the national capital. The court warned that it was feared that the virus would again raise its ugly head and could attack people badly. In such a situation, the government should not step back from its responsibility to create a buffer stock of liquid medical oxygen (LMO). The court has fixed the hearing on May 24, directing the central government to submit its report on the buffer stock of oxygen. A division bench of Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Jasmeet Singh said during the hearing that it is the duty of the Center and the Delhi government to ensure that they are ready again to deal with the situation. The bench said, "If you (the government) have not taken appropriate steps, then we will come and chase you again." The Delhi government's counsel said that a buffer stock of 419 MT (MT) of LMO has been created at various locations. They are arranging to make more stocks in the next 10 days. The court observed that the Center in its report has not disclosed what steps it has taken to fulfill its obligation as per the Supreme Court order. The court said that this is a temporary phase, we know that it can come back and kill us. Both the Center and the Delhi Government are reminding that the Supreme Court has placed the responsibility of creating buffer stocks mainly on the Center and the Government of Delhi. The court said that the two governments would have to act responsibly to protect the health of the common people. Ensure that there is no catastrophic condition such as a current when the virus is resurfaced. Advocates of the Central Government said that they are serious on this issue and the matter is not being taken lightly.कोविड-19 मामलों में आ रही कमी को सरकार हल्के में न ले – दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट delhipolicesecurityब्लैक आउट करने और आतंकी हमले की धमकी के बाद हाई अलर्ट पर दिल्ली Shah Rukh Pathan, who pointed pistol at head constable, pleads with courtहेड कॉन्स्टेबल पर पिस्तौल तानने वाले शाहरुख पठान ने लगाई कोर्ट से गुहार in-rohini-court-shootout-delhi-police-arrested-2-accused-on-the-basis-of-cctv-footageरोहिणी कोर्ट शूटआउट में दिल्ली पुलिस ने सीसीटीवी फुटेज के आधार पर 2 आरोपियों को गिरफ्तार किया . There is a big threat looming over the Indian High Commission in Pakistan. There is also a lot of negligence on the part of Pakistan's Imran Khan government in the security system. India has registered its protest over Pakistan's lax attitude towards the security arrangements of the High Commission. The Indian government has recently asked Pakistan to investigate an alleged security breach outside the Indian High Commission. According to the information, some strange activities were seen in the High Security Zone i.e. Diplomatic Enclave outside the Indian High Commission in Islamabad in the last week of May. A car stopped in an area restricted to people outside the Indian High Commission. Out of this, people were seen unloading boxes of Kovid-19 relief material including PPE kits. One of them even clicked pictures while standing with the box. The Indian High Commission was in the background of these pictures. Please note that photography is prohibited where the pictures were clicked. It was learned that some policemen were accompanying them, raising suspicion that the local authorities may have facilitated the exercise. Taking this incident very seriously, Indian officials have asked Pakistan for an official investigation. However, the motive behind that incident is not yet known. Explain that even an ordinary Pakistani citizen needs special permission to enter the High Commission. Pakistan had offered help amidst the second wave of Corona epidemic in India. The Pakistani Foreign Ministry had said that we are ready to send certain materials used in the war against Corona in the spirit of solidarity with the people of India in view of the current wave of Kovid-19. The statement also said that both the countries can explore possible avenues of cooperation for further quick supply to meet the challenges arising due to the global pandemic. A few days before this, Imran Khan also showed solidarity regarding Corona in India by tweeting. However, India did not accept Pakistan's offer of help.पाकिस्तान की राजधानी इस्लामाबाद में भारतीय दूतावास पर मंडरा रहा खतरा पायल घोष ने अनुराग कश्यप् पर लगाया यौन उत्पीड़न का आरोप, खोले कई बड़े राज Delhi High Court gives a big blow to traders, will not get permission to sell firecrackersदिल्ली हाई कोर्ट ने व्यापारियों को दिया तगड़ा झटका, नही मिलेगी पटाखे बेचने की इजाजत Nirav Modi, the prime accused in the PNB scam and fugitive diamond businessman, has now approached the British High Court. He has approached the High Court to stop extradition. Nirav Modi has sought to challenge the decision of the lower court of London in the High Court of Britain. In February this year, the London lower court approved the extradition of Nirav Modi to India. Fugitive Modi has sought permission to challenge the extradition order in the High Court. Let us know that on 25 February, the Westminster Magistrate Court of London approved the extradition of Nirav Modi. The UK Home Department gave permission for the extradition of Nirav Modi after getting information about the decision of the British court. Diamond businessman Nirav Modi, along with his maternal uncle Mehul Choksi, is accused of cheating Punjab National Bank for Rs 13,000 crore. On January 2018, PNB lodged an FIR against Nirav and his associates in India, but before that Nirav Modi absconded from here.ब्रिटेन में नीरव मोदी ने लगाई हाईकोर्ट से गुहार chhath_pujaसार्वजनिक छठ पूजा की इजाजत देने की मांग हाई कोर्ट ने की खारिज, दिल्ली सरकार के फैसले को सही ठहराया। Omicron UpdateOmicron Update : इस तारीख पर कोरोना की लहर होगी पीक पर Major decision of Supreme Court in Nepal, unification of Nepal Communist Party canceled, handed over its command to Kattel!नेपाल में सुप्रीम कोर्ट का बड़ा फैसला, नेपाल कम्युनिस्ट पार्टी का एकीकरण रद, कट्टेल को सौंपी इसकी कमान ! Speak softly to Maryam Nawaz, do not make such a mistake again, otherwise you will regret itमरियम नवाज के दो-टूक बोल, फिर मत करना ऐसी गलती, नहीं तो पड़ेगा पछताना ! The High Court has directed the Delhi Police and the CBI to set up a special cell in four weeks to nab the fugitive criminals. Along with this, the court has asked the Delhi Police to prepare a digital surveillance system so that digital data of various government departments, telecom companies and banks can be checked through this system. Not only this, he said that any person can nab the fugitive criminal and immediately hand him over to the nearest police station. Justice JR Midha, in his 187-page judgment, has asked the Delhi Police and the CBI to check all social media accounts and email IDs of any accused while arresting them. Apart from this, they have also been instructed to keep a copy of any two identity cards from their photograph and PAN card, Aadhar card, passport, driving license. The court said that in order to nab the absconding criminal, his photo, name and address, etc., should be uploaded on the website of the legal agencies of the states other than the concerned state so that it helps in nabbing him. He directed the Delhi Police as well as the CBI to set up a special cell to trace the criminals declared absconding. Apart from this, the process of confiscation of their movable and immovable properties should be started. The court gave this direction while issuing guidelines in declaring an accused as an offender. भगोड़े अपराधी को पकड़कर कोई भी सौंप सकता है थाने में – दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट n the Narada sting case, Supreme Court Justice Aniruddha Bose has recused himself from the case. However, the matter will be heard in the Supreme Court today. The matter will now be heard by a bench of Justice Vineet Sharan and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari. Let us inform that today Justice Aniruddha Bose had decided to recuse himself in the Narada sting case. Besides this, petitions filed by Mamata Banerjee, her law minister and the state have challenged the High Court's refusal to take her affidavit on record in the CBI's plea to transfer the Narada case. Justice Hemant Gupta has requested the Chief Justice whether a bench can be constituted to hear the matter today? West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had approached the Supreme Court after she received setback from the Calcutta High Court in the Narada sting tape case. He has moved the Supreme Court against the denial of permission by the Calcutta High Court to file affidavits on the role of himself and State Law Minister Malay Ghatak on the day of the arrest of four Trinamool Congress leaders by the CBI on May 17. A bench of Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice Aniruddha Bose heard separate appeals filed by the Chief Minister, Ghatak and West Bengal on Tuesday, but before that Justice Aniruddha Bose recused himself from the case.नारदा स्टिंग मामले की सुनवाई आज , पढ़े पूरी खबर Kadilli High Court reprimanded the central government, know what it said The High Court has directed the Central Government to clarify why it cannot formulate a formula for determining the maximum retail price (MRP) of an oxygen concentrator. The court said that due to the non-determination of the price of the oxygen concentrator widely used in the treatment of corona infection, a large amount is being recovered from the people. The court gave this direction after the central government expressed its inability to fix the prices. A division bench of Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Jasmeet Singh said that we are asking the government not to fix its value in rupees or money, but to decide a principle on which the oxygen concentrators will be sold. The bench said that Sircar should understand when he will not intervene in an extraordinary situation like corona epidemic. The High Court has said that there should be a limit on the price of any product, because the price of anything cannot be unlimited. The court questioned that if a Chinese producer company says tomorrow that it will sell it at 5 times the price, will we allow it, it cannot be allowed in the interest of consumers and patients. The High Court stated in a stern tone that it is your responsibility as a government to decide that people are actually able to afford the product and they do not have to pay much more than their nose.दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने केंद्र सरकार को फटकार, जानिए क्या कहा The Islamabad High Court, which is hearing the death sentence case of retired Indian Navy officer Kulbhushan Jadhav, has asked India to cooperate in the legal proceedings. The court on Wednesday started hearing a petition by the Law and Justice Ministry of Pakistan There is a demand to appoint a lawyer for Jadhav. After the decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Pakistan implemented the CJ (Review and Reconsideration) Ordinance last year, so that Jadhav could get legal help, said Attorney General Khalid Javed Khan. . He alleged, the Indian government deliberately did not attend the hearing and is objecting to the trial in a Pakistani court. India also refused to present a lawyer. Said, it is like surrendering sovereign rights.पाकिस्तानी बोला :कुलभूषण जाधव मामले में सहयोग करे भारत एनआइए को लगी बड़ी कामयाबी हाथ, 9 आंतकवादी को किया गिरफ्तार The Supreme Court on Monday refused interim bail to former Uttar Pradesh minister Gayatri Prajapati, accused in the gang rape case of a woman and her minor daughter. Prajapati had sought interim bail for treatment. Senior advocate Manan Mishra, appearing for Prajapati before a bench of Justice Navin Sinha and Justice R Subhash Reddy, said that his client should be granted bail for three months for treatment. . On the other hand, Additional Solicitor General SV Raju opposed Prajapati's plea. After hearing the arguments of both the sides, the bench refused to grant any relief to Prajapati. The bench told Prajapati's counsel that he can move the Allahabad High Court. In this petition filed through advocate Durga Dutt, it was said that Prajapati is suffering from many diseases and needs proper treatment. Prajapati said that the proper treatment for his problem is not available in King George Medical College, Lucknow. Therefore, he should be granted interim bail for three months to undergo treatment at Delhi's AIIMS or Bhailor. It is known that even before this, the High Court had granted interim bail to Prajapati for two months on medical grounds, but the Supreme Court had set aside that decision of the High Courtयूपी के पूर्व मंत्री गायत्री प्रजापति को सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने  जमानत देने से  किया इनकार rti khulasaआरटीआइ से मिली जानकारी में सामने आई जनता के पैसे की बर्बादी की हकीकत बाबरी केस: 28 साल बाद होगा बाबरी केस का फैसला, बढ़ी सुरक्षा खुलासाः बच्चों के साथ यौन शोषण का आरोपी जेई सीबीआई की गिरफ्त में he Saket court of Delhi has slammed businessman Navneet Kalra in connection with the seizure of oxygen equipment required to treat Kovid-19 patients. The court on Thursday refused to grant anticipatory bail to businessman Navneet Kalra. These oxygen devices were recovered from several restaurants in the national capital, including 'Khan Chacha'. While giving the order, Additional Sessions Judge Sandeep Garg said that the application is rejected. Let me tell you that the court on Wednesday reserved its verdict on the anticipatory bail plea of ​​businessman Navneet Kalra, accused in the case of oxygen cylinder black marketing. After hearing the arguments of the defense and government side, Additional Sessions Judge Sandeep Garg of Saket court said that they will give their verdict on Thursday. Also, the equipment is not black-sold, but is being sold and sold under the law itself. The government lawyer said that the accused have been absconding since the time of the incident and a large quantity of equipment has been recovered from their premises. The investigation of the case is going on, in which case the bail application should be rejected.साकेत कोर्ट का नवनीत कालरा को बड़ा झटका , कि जमानत याचिका खारिज mask_delhiकार से दिल्ली जा रहे हैं तो पढ़ लें ये जरूरी खबर, सरकार ने अब ये कर दिया है अनिवार्य। moti_lal_vohraनहीं रहे दिग्‍गज कांग्रेस नेता मोतीलाल वोरा, 93 साल की उम्र में निधन, PM Modi समेत सियासी हस्तियों ने जताई शोक संवेदना लॉकडाउन लगाने वाली जनहित याचिका खारिज After the election results in Assam, the situation of the controversy over the name of the Chief Minister will become clear today. Who will be the next Chief Minister of Assam, its official announcement will be in the meeting of the legislative parties after some time. But in the race so far, Hemant Himanta Biswa Sarma is leading ahead of Sarbananda Sonowal. According to the information received by Hindustan Times, the Bharatiya Janata Party may make Hemant Biswa Sarma the next Chief Minister of Assam, according to the churning that took place in the Delhi meeting. At the same time, Sarbananda Sonowal can be brought to Delhi later. For the last six days in Assam, there was a lot of confusion in the BJP leadership about the new Chief Minister. To resolve this, the central leadership on Saturday summoned the outgoing Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal and the state Health Minister and strong contender for the post of Chief Minister Hemant Biswa Sarma, and discussed them extensively. The meeting lasted for about three hours at BJP President JP Nadda's residence. Home Minister Amit Shah and party's National Organization Minister BL Santosh were also present during this period. There are indications that the party does not want to give any indication that differences in the party or pressure on the central leadership will emerge. This is the reason why the new leader will be announced after the Legislature Party meeting to be held in Guwahati on Sunday. A Bharatiya Janata Party leader aware of the matter said that the name of Hemant Biswa Sarma could be announced this afternoon as the Chief Minister of Assam. Let us know that the meeting of the BJP Legislature Party in Assam will start from 11 am on Sunday, in which the next Chief Minister of the state will be elected. The BJP-led coalition won the state assembly elections a week ago with a clear majority. The meeting will begin at 11 am and Union Minister Narendra Singh Tomar and party general secretary Arun Singh will be present as central observers. BJP's Assam incharge Baijayant Panda will also be present on the occasion. BJP state unit president Ranjit Kumar Das visited the assembly on Saturday evening to arrange a meeting of the legislature party. In the meeting held in Delhi on Saturday, Hemant first called Vishwa Sarma and spoke to him. After this Sarbananda Sonowal was called and talked to him. After separate meetings with these two leaders, the BJP leadership discussed among themselves and then the two leaders were called together. According to sources, the party kept the whole thing in front of both the leaders and a consensus has been reached about the new leader, but it has not been disclosed yet. Significantly, in the BJP leadership assembly elections, the face of the outgoing Chief Minister Sonobal was not put forward and came to the polls under collective leadership. Earlier in the 2016 assembly elections, the party announced Sarbananda Sonowal as its future Chief Minister. But despite being the Chief Minister this time, he was not made a face. Since then, there was speculation that there would be a change of leadership when it came to power. Hemant Vishwa Sarma has also been a strong contender for the post of Chief Minister. Sources say the party leadership does not want to give any indication that the leadership is taking a decision under pressure. Therefore, there is also a possibility that Sonowal should be retained as the Chief Minister for some time. However, Hemant's hand is considered heavy when a decision is taken on the views of the MLAs. The BJP has sixty legislators in the 126-member assembly in the state, while its allies Asam Gana Parishad has nine and UPPL six. Thus the NDA has the support of 75 MLAs.हेमंत बिस्वा सरमा बन सकते है असम के अगले मुख्यमंत्री Indian Girl Set An ExampleIndian Girl Set An Example : रूस यूक्रेन हमले के बीच 17 साल के एक भारतीय लड़की ने की मिसाल पेश… In the midst of rising corona cases in Delhi and collapsing health services, one of his MLAs has given a major blow to the Delhi government. MLA Shoaib Iqbal has appealed to the High Court that chaos has spread in Delhi and impose President's rule here. Shoaib Iqbal, an MLA from Mattiamhal, Delhi, has said this by looking at the current situation in Delhi. Their complaint is that patients are not getting medicines nor hospitals and oxygen in Delhi. No one is being heard and people are being killed. He said that he is very sad that he is not able to help anyone. He has no hearing even after being a six-time MLA. He says that this is what he wants in Delhi immediately under President's rule or else the dead bodies will be laid here. Shoaib Iqbal has made such a demand because he says that Delhi is not getting the support of the Center, if everything comes in the hands of the Center, then the work will be done. There should be President's rule in Delhi for three months.आप विधायक ने की हाईकोर्ट से अपील, राजधानी दिल्ली में लगाया जाए राष्ट्रपति शासन
Photo of Uk Varta Desk Uk Varta Desk Follow on Twitter Send an email January 18, 2021
Photo of Uk Varta Desk

Uk Varta Desk

Related Articles

भनकुण्ड पहुंची भगवान तुंगनाथ की डोली, मधुर धुनों से गुंजायमान हुई घाटी

November 5, 2020

डोईवाला,ब्रेकिंग मुख्यमंत्री पुष्कर सिंह धामी अपने कैबिनेट के सहयोगियों के साथ जॉली ग्रांट एयरपोर्ट से रामलला के दर्शन के लिए हुए रवाना…

February 20, 2024

पलायन आयोग की सर्वे रिपोर्टः बागेश्वर के कपकोट कम हुई आबादी

December 2, 2020
Harda will push auto, Congress will go on the streets to protest against rising inflation and unemployment!

हरदा लगाएंगे ऑटो को धक्का बढ़ती महंगाई और बेरोज़गारी के विरोध में सड़को पर उतरेगी कांग्रेस !

March 5, 2021
Police Will Be Recruited

Bumper Transfers Of Police Officers : पुलिस महकमे में अधिकारियों के हुए बंपर तबादले, ये है लिस्ट

December 16, 2021

हरीश रावत का बड़ा बयान कहा “सिद्धू” ऐसा शेर है जो सड़ा मास कभी नहीं खाएगा

October 8, 2020

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© Copyright 2025, All Rights Reserved  |  UK VARTA News
Back to top button
google.com, pub-3499213414506936, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0